# Framework agreement for the supply of 0,4 kV, 10 kV and 36 kV cables

- **Source:** TED · `18095-2024`
- **Buyer:** Nexel A/S
- **Published:** 2024-01-11
- **Deadline:** —
- **Estimated value:** 250,000,000 DKK
- **CPV codes:** 31321200
- **Place-of-performance NUTS:** DK022, DNK
- **Buyer-address NUTS:** —
- **Notice type:** can-standard / 30

## Procedure details

Source lists may span several lots; list positions do not establish relationships.

### Procedure Types

- neg-w-call

### Award Criterion Names

- Price
- Cable temperature
- Bending radius
- Handling

### Award Criterion Descriptions

- Evaluated on the basis of the overall price for evaluation purposes (referred to in the following as the "evaluation-technical price"). The overall evaluation-technical price is calculated on the basis of the estimated amount for each cable and the estimated amount for drums together with the offered prices. The evaluation technical pris is a summation the total for cables and the total for drums.
- Evaluated according to evaluable requirement on the lowest cable temperature during the installation by making special precautions based on the scale from -1°C to -15°C.
- According to evaluable requirement on the lowest bending radius of the cable when laying on the scale from 8 x diameter to 12 x diameter.
- Evaluated on the following sub-subcriteria: - Cables should be with rip cord - The robustness of the outer sheath - Marking on outer sheath should be durable and easily readable - Cables should be easy to bend
- Evaluated on the basis of the overall price for evaluation purposes (referred to in the following as the "evaluation-technical price"). The overall evaluation-technical price is calculated as the sum of the items listed in Appendix 2, Price catalogue, multiplied with the estimated volume.
- evaluated according to evaluable requirement on the lowest cable temperature during the installation by making special precautions based on the scale from -1°C to -15°C.
- evaluated on the following sub-subcriteria: According to evaluable requirements on the lowest bending radius of the cable when laying on the scale from 8 x diameter to 12 x diameter.
- Evaluated on the following sub-subcriteria: - Cables should be with rip cord - Robustness of the outer sheath - Marking on outer sheath should be durable and easily readable - Cables should be easy to bend - Cables should hold their form - Shape of cables - Stripping force - Core marking should be durable and easily readable
- evaluated according to evaluable requirements on the lowest cable temperature during the installation by making special precautions based on the scale from -1°C to -15°C.
- Evaluated on the following sub-subcriteria: - Cables should be with rip cord - Marking on outer sheath should be durable and easy readable - Cables should be easy to bend - Cables should hold their form - Compound type - Stripping force - Core marking should be durable and easily readable

## Description

The tender procedure concerns the award of a framework agreements for the supply of 0,4 kV, 10 kV and 36 kV cables. Lot 1: Low voltage cables: This lot includes 0,6/1kV cables, as specified in Appendix 1: Specifications for requirements regarding low voltage cables (Lot 1) and stated in Appendix 2: Prices and forecasts (Lot 1). Lot 2 Medium voltage cables: This lot includes 12/17,5/36kV cables as specified in Appendix 1: Specifications for requirements regarding medium voltage cables (Lot 2) and stated in Appendix 2: Prices and forecasts (Lot 2). Lot 3: Low and medium voltage cables: This lot includes 0,6/1kV flexible rubber cables and 12/17,5kV flame retardant cables, as specified in Ap-pendix 1: Specifications for requirements regarding low and medium voltage cables (Lot 3) and stated in Appendix 2: Prices and forecasts (Lot 3). All lots are based on a framework agreement with several operators, which is done to ensure a better security of supply. All lots will be awarded to two (2) suppliers. Purchase orders will be awarded by direct award and according to a 60/40 split. The supplier who has submitted the tender with the best price-quality ratio will receive 60 % of all purchase orders issued during the term of the Framework agreements. The supplier who has submitted the tender with the second-best price-quality ratio will receive 40 % of all purchase orders issued during the term of the Framework agreements.

## Award result

- **Published notice total:** 1,096,000,000 DKK
- **Winner:** — · value 1,096,000,000 DKK
Published values may cover multiple lots, options and frameworks; they are not supplier revenue. Unlinked notice summaries do not assign each value or expiry to each winner.

## Original notice

https://ted.europa.eu/da/notice/-/detail/18095-2024