# Framework Agreement for Phase Conductors-OPGW-GW

- **Source:** TED · `587948-2024`
- **Buyer:** Energinet A/S
- **Published:** 2024-10-01
- **Deadline:** —
- **Estimated value:** 98,000,000 EUR
- **CPV codes:** 31321000
- **Place-of-performance NUTS:** DNK
- **Buyer-address NUTS:** —
- **Notice type:** can-standard / 30

## Procedure details

Source lists may span several lots; list positions do not establish relationships.

### Procedure Types

- neg-w-call

### Award Criterion Names

- Technical solution
- Sustainability
- Contract Terms

### Award Criterion Descriptions

- The evaluation will be based on the submitted documentation in terms of data sheets for offered conductors in relation to technical topics and the data typed in cells marked with blue in the Schedule of Prices. Deviations must be stated in Clarification List doc. 24/00591-10 in the document folder in EU-Supply. The reservations in the clarification list should be explicit and with explanation as to why the deviation is made. The fulfillment of technical requirements and design of conductors. This is evaluated based delivered datasheets of the different conductor types and the data typed in the Schedule of Prices. In the evaluation of technical requirements, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the tenderer complies with the Contracting Authority specifications, including the scope and content of any deviations in the clarification list in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: - Minimum current capacity for phase conductors and calculation of it - Maximum load on towers for phase conductors and calculation of it - Minimum breaking load - Required documentation - Maximum diameter for phase conductors - Lifetime expectancy in heavy salt polluted environments and the evidence for the postulated - Long term experience with the offered conductor type - Offered solution follows the standards in chapter 2 in ETS-0119 Conductors - Grease type - Grease applying method - Creep information - Description of test method including AC resistance test - Method to ensure HSE - Method to ensure Quality A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
- The type of transportation and the number of kilometres estimated for the transportation must be specified in the “Data Input Sustainability” and must be stated in km. In the evaluation of ‘CO2 footprint’, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The total sum of the CO2 footprint of transportation will be evaluated. The CO2 footprint will be calculated based on the formula: Transport km * CO2 climate change impact = CO2 footprint for the specific type of transport CO2 footprint for each type of transportation method will be added and return the Total CO2 footprint of transportation. The score of 10 will be awarded the tenderer with the lowest total of CO2 footprint. The other tenderers will be scored in relation to the tenderer with the lowest total CO2 footprint. The score will be evaluated from the following formula: Score=10- ((10/(100 %))*(Total sum of CO2 footprint-lowest total sum of CO2 footprint))/(Lowest total sum of CO2 footprint)
- If the tenderer includes a list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms: • Framework Agreement (doc. no. 24/00591-9) • Agreement under Framework Agreement (doc. no. 24/00591-11), and • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 24/00591-12) the tenderer should use the Clarification List (doc. no. 24/00591-10). The Contracting Authority explicitly note that Code of Conduct - Contract Clause and Self-assessment Questionnaire will not be part of the evaluation. The proposed deviations to the contractual terms should be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer may, however, suggest explicit and well-explained deviations to the contractual terms which the Contracting Authority has identified as competitive criteria’s below: • Framework Agreement (doc. no. 24/00591-9): o Sub-Clauses 10.3, 10.4, 10.5 & 10.6 (Termination) • In Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 24/00591-12) and, where relevant, same Clauses and Sub-Clauses in the Agreement under the Framework Agreement (doc. no. 24/00591-11): o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for sub-clause 2.3 o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (Code of Conduct, HSE and sustainability) o Clause 24 (Termination) These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
- The tenderer must include documentation of fulfillment of technical requirements and a list of reservations to. The reservations shall be written in “Clarification list” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why the reservation is made. In the evaluation of technical solution the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the tenderer complies with Contracting authority specifications, see technical requirements, including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: - Corrosion protection on metal conductors, elaborate and detailed production method description. - Methods description assuring that sufficient correction protection is applied to the OPGW is preferred An overall evaluation will be made of the solution description. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
- The tenderer must include documentation of fulfillment of technical requirements and a list of reservations to. The reservations shall be written in “Clarification list” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why the reservation is made. In the evaluation of technical solution the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the tenderer complies with Contracting authority specifications, see technical requirements, including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: - Corrosion protection on metal conductors, elaborate and detailed production method description. - Methods description assuring that sufficient correction protection is applied to the GW is preferred An overall evaluation will be made of the solution description. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.

### Options

- • Companies in which Energinet SOV or another company in the Energinet group acquire half or more than half of the capital or have the authority to exercise half or more than half of the voting rights or has the right to manage the company’s busi-ness regardless of the official name during the term of the Frame Agreement will have an option to use the Frame Agreement.
- • Companies in which Energinet SOV or another company in the Energinet group acquire half or more than half of the capital or have the authority to exercise half or more than half of the voting rights or has the right to manage the company’s busi-ness regardless of the official name during the term of the Frame Agreement will have an option to use the Frame Agreement. • Extension of the Framework Agreement for 2 times 2 years.

## Description

Establishment of Framework agreement for Phase Conductors, Optical Ground Wire (OPGW) and Ground wire (GW)

## Award result

- **Published notice total:** 105,600,000 EUR
- **Contract concluded:** 2024-07-18
- **Winner:** S. TYGESEN ENERGI AS (CVR 19661296), DE ANGELI PRODOTTI (CVR IT 03585010287), Midal Kablo Sanayi ve Ticaret (CVR 210000374500002), Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co.,Ltd. (CVR 320623138670947), Sterlite Power Transmission Limited (CVR U74120PN2015PLC156643) · value 105,600,000 EUR
Published values may cover multiple lots, options and frameworks; they are not supplier revenue. Unlinked notice summaries do not assign each value or expiry to each winner.

## Original notice

https://ted.europa.eu/da/notice/-/detail/587948-2024