Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED563648-2024

Framework Agreement for Compressor Container Packages

Ordregiver
Energinet
Oplyst værdi / estimat
45.000.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
19.9.2024
CPV
42123100, 42124340, 45351000, 50531300
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to establish a framework agreement for compressor container supply to biogas projects in Denmark. The framework agreement covers installation of a number of reverse-flow plants with compressors for moving upgraded biogas from the distribution grid into the 80 barg natural gas transmission grid in Denmark. The units which are planned to be procured under this Framework Agreement shall cover the capacity range from 3.500 Nm3/hr. to 10.000 Nm3/hr., with a min. inlet pressure of either 12 barg, 23 barg or 35 barg and an approximate max. outlet pressure of either 60 barg or 80 barg. Furthermore, the Framework Agreement consist of an option to purchase compressors with a capacity range up to 17.000 Nm3/hr. In addition to the supply of compressor packages the scope also includes an option for Service and Mainte-nance Agreement. For further details concerning the purchase, reference is made to the appendices to the tender documents. The total purchase is made for a period of 4 years from the signing of the framework agreement with the option of an extension for 2x2 years. Orders under the framework agreement will be allocated directly to the supplier which, in the view of the Contracting Authority, has submitted the most economically advantageous tender, see section 4.1. The estimated consumption during the term of the framework agreement including the options is expected to amount to 16 container compressors in total. The estimated number of units is as follows: - 2 compressors each for ID 1, ID 4, ID 6, and ID 7 - 2 compressors for ID 2, including an option for 1 additional compressor - 2 compressors for ID 3.b, including an option for 1 additional compressor - Option for 2 compressors for ID 3.c The framework agreement consists of an initial call-off of 8 compressors; two of each of the following: ID 2, ID 3.b, ID 6, and ID 4. The initial call-off of 8 compressors will be awarded on the basis of the award of the framework agreement to the tenderer that achieves the highest score, cf. section 4.2. Following the abovementioned orders, 4 compressors are expected to be ordered, which is expected to be two of each of the following: ID 1 and ID 7. The consumption figures are estimates only and are consequently not binding for the Contracting Authority. The Contracting Authority is not obligated to purchase solely from the framework agreement and may in connection with single-standing purchases choose to tender these independently.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Delivery time
  • QHSE and Social Sustainability
  • Service and Maintenance
  • Technical Solution
  • Contract terms

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting authority will evaluate the total price, cf. the Schedule of Prices. All items in the schedule of prices (yellow cells) must be filled in by the tenderer to be compliant. TOTEX CAPEX: Including but not limited to Design, Production, Delivery, Installation and commissioning. OPEX: For 1 year (average price based on 5 years of operation) incl: a. Preventive maintenance b. Wear parts c. Consumables such as oil and electricity d. Service and Maintenance Service and Support (hourly rates): Based on the estimated hours the evaluation will be based on the tenderer’s offered hourly rates for support hotline and onsite Engi-neer and Technician as specified in the technical specifications and Service and Maintenance Agreement. The evaluation will be based on the values stipulated in item A1 to A5 in the tender list. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total price (Totex + Hourly Rates), cf. the Schedule of Prices under “Summary”.
  • As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the maximum guaranteed delivery time from signing of the Agreements under the Framework Agreement till Acceptance of all documentation and hand-over of compressor package for the specific time schedules (ID 2, ID 3.b, ID 6, and ID 4) and generic time schedule. The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer. Specific time schedule for ID 2: • A maximum delivery time up to 65 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 73 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. Specific time schedule for ID 3.b: • A maximum delivery time up to 78 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 86 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. Specific time schedule for ID 6: • A maximum delivery time of up to 95 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 103 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. Specific time schedule for ID 4: • A maximum delivery time of up to 108 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 116 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. Generic time schedule: • A maximum delivery time of up to 65 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 80 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. Point scores are awarded for each sub-sub-criterion, and the overall score for “Delivery time” will be calculated as the average of all points.
  • In the evaluation of 'QHSE and Social Sustainability', the Contracting authority will emphasize the following: Health and Safety: It will be considered favourable if the Tenderer: • Focuses on eliminating risks, rather than mitigating the risks. • Presents better ways of eliminating risks in relation to best practice. • Provides relevant risk assessments for the scope of work in relation to access to equipment, coolers, junc boxes and valves. • Has detailed Method Statements which are relevant, safe to work by and shows knowledge of the work scope e.g. lifting/crane appliances. Quality: It will be considered favourable if the Tenderer: • Focuses on eliminating risks, rather than mitigating the risks. • Presents better ways of eliminating risks in relation to best practice. • Presents workflow and control plan for documentation and certificates. Environment: It will be considered favourable if the Tenderer: • Identifies/assess relevant environmental risks and mitigating actions, as avoiding oil disposal via e.g. drip trays and vent lines to safe area. • Has detailed Method Statements (RAMS) which are relevant, safe to work by and shows knowledge of the work scope. Social sustainability: The evaluation will be based on the tenderer’s description of ensuring Code of Conduct throughout the supply chain. It will be evaluated positive if: • The description includes clear, comprehensive, and easily accessible Code of Conduct throughout the supply chain. • Description on how relevant parts of the Code of Conduct is incorporated into contracts throughout the supply chain, and further, how these parts are identified as relevant. • How anonymous and accessible reporting channels for sub-suppliers to report Code of Conduct violations are implemented. Further, if the description includes clear procedures for handling reports of violations. • The description includes robust and risk-based audits with suppliers and sub-suppliers throughout the supply chain. An overall evaluation will be conducted.
  • When evaluating 'Service and Maintenance', The Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: Service and maintenance • It will be evaluated positive, if maintenance requires a minimum of special education to the technicians, a minimum of special tools and a minimum of spare parts. • It will be evaluated positive if there are a long maintenance intervals and short outage periods. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • When evaluating 'Technical Solution', The Contracting Authority will assess the submitted technical proposal, including the degree to which tenderer complies with Appendix 2: Scope of Work and Employer’s Requirements, including Appendix 2.1: Technical Specification for Container Compressor Packages, including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: Technical compliance • It will be evaluated positive, if the compressor skid layout is simple, especially concerning access to components during operation, maintenance and inspections. • It will be evaluated positive, if the modular solution has a well-proportioned possibility for maintenance and service purposes with necessary lifting or handling appliances, while being as compact as possible. Reliability and efficiency • It will be evaluated positive, if the compressor’s total efficiency in various flow cases is high, including recovery sys-tem (if necessary). • It will be evaluated positive, if the unit operation range has high flexibility in flow, e.g., avoiding unnecessary recycling at low flow. • Based on the guaranteed uptime factor in %, a high up-time will be preferred. Emissions • The lowest possible compressor emission/leak rate per hour will be evaluated positive. • The maximum sound emission level will be evaluated, where low noise emissions will be preferred. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

Oplyste optioner

  • Companies in which Energinet SOV or another company in the Energinet group acquire half or more than half of the capital or have the authority to exercise half or more than half of the voting rights or has the right to manage the company’s business regardless of the official name during the term of the Frame Agreement will have an option to use the Frame Agreement. The framework agreement can be extended for (2x2 years) by a written notice to the Supplier no later than 3 months before the termination of the Agreement. 5 years’ service and maintenance after end of defects notification period.

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.