Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED6220-2026

Framework agreement concerning Meter Container Units

Ordregiver
Energinet Gastransmission A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
6.500.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
7.1.2026
CPV
44610000, 44613300, 51210000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Tildeling

Vinderlisten dækker bekendtgørelsen. Denne visning har ikke en sikker kobling mellem hver vinder, delkontrakt, værdi og udløbsdato. Se originalen for fordelingen.

Bekendtgørelsens samlede værdi: 6.500.000 EURKontrakt indgået: 17.12.2025
Bohlen & Doyen Bau GmbH
Registreringsnr. DE 254277000Oplyst værdi: 6.500.000 EUR

Beløb er offentliggjorte værdier i bekendtgørelser og kan omfatte flere delkontrakter, rammeaftalelofter og estimater. De viser ikke faktisk omsætning eller forbrug. Valutaer summeres hver for sig uden omregning. Manglende beløb er ikke nul. Se datagrundlag og metode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority intends to install several reverseflow plants for injection of upgraded biogas/biomethane from the natural gas distribution grid into the natural gas transmission grid in Denmark. Meter container units for measurement of the gas mass flow are part of the reverse flow plant design. Therefore, the Contracting Authority intends to purchase meter container units for measurement of the gas mass flow are part of the reverse flow plant design. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. The tendered framework agreement has a duration of 4 years. The framework agreement can be extended for 2x2 years. Orders under the framework agreement will be allocated directly to the supplier which, in the view of the Contracting Authority, has submitted the most economically advantageous tender, see section 4.1. The estimated consumption during the term of the framework agreement is expected to amount to seven (10) meter container units in total. The estimated number of units is the following: - Two (2) meter container units each for ID 1, ID 2, and ID 3.b - One (1) meter container unit each for ID 3.c, ID 4, ID 6, and ID 7 The framework agreement consists of an initial call-off of two (2) meter container units, each of the following: ID 2, ID 3.b or ID 3.c. The initial call-off of two (2) meter container units will be awarded on the basis of the award of the framework agreement to the tenderer that achieves the highest score, cf. section 4.2. Following the abovementioned orders, four (4) meter container units are expected to be ordered, which is expected to be one of each of the following: ID 4, ID 6, ID 1, and ID 7. The value of the framework agreement is expected to amount to EUR 6.500.000. The consumption figures are estimates only and are consequently not binding for the Contracting Authority. During the specified period, the Contracting Authority has the right to purchase the services and/or goods comprised by the framework agreement from the selected tenderer, but is not obligated to do so, cf. the framework sec. 1.3.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Solution Description
  • Quality management
  • Time schedule
  • Delivery time
  • Project management
  • Contract terms

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • When evaluating 'Price’, the Contracting authority will evaluate the grand total, contract price, cf. the Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc. no. 24/15046-7). The tenderer must fill in all open items (green cells) in Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
  • When evaluating 'Solution Description', The Contracting Authority will evaluate the submitted proposal including the degree to which tenderer complies with Appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc. no. 24/15046-1), including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Modification of container • It will be evaluated positively if the proposed solution for door assemblies, recommended reinforcements and ventilation systems are fit for purpose. b) Procedure for replacement • It is evaluated positively if the procedure for replacement of the meter elements includes clear step by step operations and easy access for all activities required for replacement. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • For the sub-criterion 'Quality management’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the Tenderer provides assurance as to the quality of production. The evaluation will therefore include the Tenderer’s ability to ensure quality in the entire production and across all interfaces and will be evaluated to the extend the requirements from the technical specification as well as the requirements from standards are met. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Fabrication processes: • It is evaluated positive that manufacturing interfaces are kept at a minimum to prevent unnecessary risk. b) Inspection and Test Plan (ITP): • It is evaluated positively that references to internal quality procedures and quality procedures of sub-suppliers are included to ensure that quality requirements are met. • It is evaluated positively that involvement of third-party inspection is specified in the ITP and time is allowed for the activities. c) Quality management systems: • It is evaluated positively if the tenderer and relevant sub-supplier have implemented third-party certified systems to support quality management. d) Sub-supplier management: • It is evaluated positively if relevant sub-supplier are assessed and approved. e) CE marking: • It is evaluated positively that third-party involvement is specified, and intervention points are identified for the CE marking process. f) Document control system: • It is evaluated positively if the document control system includes internal review and approval steps for master record data book (MRB) to reduce the time of follow up during review. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • For the evaluation of 'Time Schedule’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, especially concerning: a) Time schedule for project execution • It will be evaluated positively if the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities. • It will be evaluated positively if the schedule reflects sufficient time for 3rd party engagement. • It will be evaluated positively if the schedule adequately allows for the delivery of supplies provided by the Contracting Authority during the course of the project execution. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • The evaluation of 'Delivery time’ will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer: • A maximum delivery time of up to 16 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 28 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.
  • Evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Project management’ will be based on the competences and experiences demonstrated in the included visual chart illustrating the organizational structure. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: • It will be evaluated positively if the proposed organizational structure is operational, efficient and has clear lines of communication. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

Oplyste optioner

  • The framework agreement can be extended for (2x2 years) by a written notice to the Supplier no later than 3 months before the termination of the Agreement
Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.