Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED766898-2024

Tender of Compressor Service and Gas cooler cleaning

Ordregiver
Evida Service A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
12.000.000 DKK
Frist
—
Publiceret
16.12.2024
CPV
50531300, 42124340
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK, DK041

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Customer wishes to procure maintenance services related to Preventive Maintenance Work and Repair Work, and gas cooler cleaning, of the Customer’s existing 99 Fornovo Gas, 5 Neuman & Esser, and 5 KwangShin gas biomethane injection compressors.The compressors are used for controlling the pressure when channeling biomethane gas between the low-pressure network of 4 or 7 bar(g) to the high-pressure gas network of 19 to 80 bar(g). The compressors are placed at different biogas plant sites around Jutland, Fyn, Zealand, and islands connected to mainland by bridge.At most sites, two or more compressors are installed to make failover possible and to mitigate the immediate impact in case of unplanned stops and/or breakdowns.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Quality

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • Evaluated on the basis of the overall price for evaluation purposes (referred to in the following as the "evaluation-technical price"). The overall evaluation-technical price is calculated as: • Avg. hourly rate for predictive service (70%) • Avg. hourly rate for repair and ad-hoc other work (25%) • Hourly rate for emergency helpdesk (5%) as specified in Appendix 4 Prices. With regard to the financial sub-criterion ”Price,” each tender will be awarded points in accordance with a financial framework. The financial framework is lowest price + 25% (the gradient). The compliant tender with the lowest evaluation-technical price is awarded the highest number of points on the scale (maximum points). Tenders with an evaluation-technical price that exactly matches the financial framework (lowest price + 25 %) or exceeds this framework are awarded the lowest number of points on the scale (minimum points). Tenders with an evaluation-technical price that lies within the financial framework are awarded points by linear interpolation: Maximum points-(((maximum points-minimum points))/gradient)*((price of tender-lowest price))/(lowest price). In the formula, price of tender constitutes the evaluation-technical price of the tender in question which, using the formula, is awarded points by linear interpolation; lowest price is the evaluation-technical price of the compliant tender offering the lowest price; and the gradient is the addition to the lowest price on which the financial framework is based. The point for “Price” will be rounded to two (2) decimals. Correction model extension of financial framework If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one (1) or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 25%, the gradient is fixed at 50%. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points. If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one (1) or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 %, X is fixed at 75 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 75 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.
  • Quality will be evaluated on the basis of the following sub-sub-criteria: • Solution description of preventive maintenance, cf. Appendix 1 Scope of Work ID1.2 (20%), • Scheduling of preventive maintenance, cf. Appendix 1 Scope of Work ID1.3 (20%), • Other works related to preventive maintenance cf. Appendix 1 Scope of Work ID 1.5 (10%), • Capabilities and competences, cf. Appendix 1 Scope of Work ID 6.2 (50%) With regard to the qualitative sub-criterion “Quality”, each tender will be awarded points in accordance with a qualitative evaluation. The qualitative evaluation will be performed for each sub-sub-criterion under the qualitative sub-criterion. The qualitative evaluation will be performed in accordance with the evaluation basis of the sub-sub-criterion in question, see Appendix 1 – Scope of Work. With the qualitative evaluation, the Contracting Entity will award the number of points that corresponds to the evaluation on the descriptive scale cf. Tender Specification, section 11.5. Only whole points will be awarded to each sub-subcriteria, i.e. no decimals. The number of points awarded in accordance with a sub-sub-criterion will be included with the weighting of the sub-sub-criterion in the calculation of the overall number of points awarded to the qualitative sub-criterion to which the sub-sub-criterion belongs.
  • Price will be evaluated on the basis of the overall price for evaluation purposes (referred to in the following as the "evaluation-technical price"). The overall evaluation-technical price is calculated as weighted unit prices pr. gas cooler cleaning of the Compressor (types), as specified in Appendix 4 – Prices. With regard to the financial sub-criterion ”Price,” each tender will be awarded points in accordance with a financial framework. The evaluation will be based on an evaluation-technical price calculated as stated in Appendix 4 – Prices as the total estimated sum of service and repair in the term of the contract. The financial framework is lowest price + 25% (the gradient). The compliant tender with the lowest evaluation-technical price is awarded the highest number of points on the scale (maximum points:10). Tenders with an evaluation-technical price that exactly matches the financial framework (lowest price + 25 %) or exceeds this framework are awarded the lowest number of points on the scale (minimum points:0). Tenders with an evaluation-technical price that lies within the financial framework are awarded points by linear interpolation: Maximum points-(((maximum points-minimum points))/gradient)*((price of tender-lowest price))/(lowest price). In the formula, price of tender constitutes the evaluation-technical price of the tender in question which, using the formula, is awarded points by linear interpolation; lowest price is the evaluation-technical price of the compliant tender offering the lowest price; and the gradient is the addition to the lowest price on which the financial framework is based. The point for “Price” will be rounded to two (2) decimals. Correction model extension of financial framework If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one (1) or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 25%, the gradient is fixed at 50%. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points. If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one (1) or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 %, X is fixed at 75 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 75 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points
  • Quality will be evaluated on the basis of the following sub-sub-criteria: • Gas cooler cleaning, Appendix 1 Scope of Work ID 8.2 (100%) With regard to the qualitative sub-criterion “Quality”, each tender will be awarded points in accordance with the qualitative evaluation. The qualitative evaluation will be performed for each sub-sub-criterion under the qualitative sub-criterion. The qualitative evaluation will be performed in accordance with the evaluation basis of the sub-sub-criterion in question, see Appendix 1 – Scope of Work. With the qualitative evaluation, the Contracting Entity will award the number of points that corresponds to the evaluation on the descriptive scale cf. Tender Specification, section 11.5. Only whole points will be awarded to each sub-subcriteria, i.e. no decimals. The number of points awarded in accordance with a sub-sub-criterion will be included with the weighting of the sub-sub-criterion in the calculation of the overall number of points awarded to the qualitative sub-criterion to which the sub-sub-criterion belongs.

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.