Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED139703-2025

400 kV Cable systems for the SLF01-project

Ordregiver
Energinet Eltransmission A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
35.000.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
3.3.2025
CPV
31321300, 31000000, 31300000, 31310000, 31320000, 31321000, 31321100, 31321200, 31321210, 31321220, 31340000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Tildeling

Vinderlisten dækker bekendtgørelsen. Denne visning har ikke en sikker kobling mellem hver vinder, delkontrakt, værdi og udløbsdato. Se originalen for fordelingen.

Bekendtgørelsens samlede værdi: 57.810.371 EURKontrakt indgået: 15.2.2025
Demirer Kablo Tesisleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Registreringsnr. 2860026719Oplyst værdi: 57.810.371 EUR

Beløb er offentliggjorte værdier i bekendtgørelser og kan omfatte flere delkontrakter, rammeaftalelofter og estimater. De viser ikke faktisk omsætning eller forbrug. Valutaer summeres hver for sig uden omregning. Manglende beløb er ikke nul. Se datagrundlag og metode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 216 km 400 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into two lots: Lot 1 and Lot 2. The scope of the two tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one or both lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded both lots. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for both lots the tenderer will be awarded both lots provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economical and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1. For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Technical Solution and HSE
  • Organization, Key Personnel and Project Programme
  • Contract term

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total tender price (for evaluation purpose), cf. Schedule of Prices, fan 2 “Grand Total”.
  • In the evaluation of “Technical Solution and HSE ”, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the documentation provided considering the purpose and characteristics of the specific project as well as the content of the referenced documents, as further elaborated below: Technical Solution 1. System and mechanical design (65% weight): The evaluation of these elements will include an overall evaluation of the engineering documentation and the quality of this documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the evaluation will consider the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this. In this context consider it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, a high sidewall pressure tolerance, a low bending radius and provide evidence of water-prof design of link-boxes. 2. Documentation (20% weight): The evaluation of this element will include an overall evaluation of the content, clarity, and level of detail of the submitted material. This includes Installation manual, maintenance manuals, drawings etc. In this context it will be evaluated positive that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. HSE (15% weight): It will be evaluated positive that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which - considering the complexity and scope - covers: • HSE Risk assessments for the scope of work where risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of the top-5 (five) risks identified for the scope of work covered by the framework agreement and their mitigations. • Method statements which are relevant, safe to work by, includes the top 5 (five) risks and show knowledge of the scope of work. The score for the sub-criteria “Technical Solution and HSE” will be calculated as: (points for “System and mechanical design” x 65%) + (points for “Referenced documents” x 20%) + (points for “HSE” x 15%)
  • In the evaluation of “Organization, Key Personnel and Project Programme” the Contracting Authority will emphasize the documentation provided concerning organization, Key Personnel and contract programme considering the purpose and characteristics of the specific project, as further elaborated below: 1. Organization (15% weight): The evaluation of “Organization” will be based on whether the proposed organizational structure is found to be operational, efficient and having clear interfaces and lines of communication taking into consideration the scope and complexity of the assignment. 2. Key personnel (15% weight): The evaluation of “Key Personnel” will be based on the demonstrated competences and experience in the included CV’s for key personnel, which in particular concerns experience within the role assigned, level of involvement and how they complement each other within the organizational structure. 3. Project Programme (70% weight): The evaluation of “Project Programme“, will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential programme contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out in the Tender Documents. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: • the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and preferably frontloaded, programme for the critical activities and productions and include considerations for actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). • the description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, installation time for joints and end terminations at site etc. • a demonstration of the tenderers ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases The score for the sub-criteria “Organization, Key Personnel and Project Programme” will be calculated as: (points for “Organization” x 15%) + (points for “Key Personnel” x 15%) + (points for “Time Schedule” x 70%)
  • The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.