Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED124098-2026

Pigging Services 2026-2027 for Gastransmission and Gas Storage Denmark - 26/00355

Ordregiver
Energinet Gastransmission A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
535.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
23.2.2026
CPV
76600000, 76100000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK, DK021

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase Pigging Services of natural gas pipelines including cleaning and intelligent pig surveys for the specified pipelines to provide recording of areas with loss of wall thickness caused either by corrosion or any other cause. The tender is divided into the following lots: • Lot 1: Pigging Services 2026-2027 for Gastransmission A/S. • Lot 2: Pigging Services 2026-2027 for Gas Storage Denmark A/S The total value of bot lots is expected to amount to 1.340.000 EUR: The Supplier must perform in-line service comprising of a cleaning and gauging survey, and a subsequent in-line inspection. The cleaning and gauging survey must clean and identify any obstructions in the pipeline in advance of the in-line inspection. The in-line inspection must log the geometry and condition of the pipeline. The in-line inspection must be performed by a single combined tool capable of logging both pipe geometry and anomalies (e.g. metal loss): •Determine significant corrosion features, with an accuracy < 0.5mm at POD > 90%. •Identifying features within the pipe wall. •Being performed in gas medium to limit the impact on operation during the inspection. Lot 1: Pigging Services 2026-2027 for Gastransmission A/S. Expected value: 535.000 EUR. Lot 1 applies to the following number of lines at the transmission grid: 1.With MFL technology or alternatives/new technology: -Egtved – Lille Torup: 1 pipeline 20” (64 km) -Lille Torup – Aalborg: 1 pipeline 14” (61 km) -Nybro – Egtved Syd: 1 pipeline 30” (56 km) -Stenlille – Torslunde: 1 pipeline 24” (43 km) -Torslunde – Lynge: 1 pipeline 16” (26 km) 2.The Contracting Authority’s Option for additional pipelines: -Vest Amager – Enghave Brygge: 1 pipeline 12” (8 km) -Hvidovre – Avedøreværket: 1 pipeline 12” (2 km) See Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1, for further information. The initially planned period of execution of pigging operations is October 2026 to March 2027. This period can be adjusted at the convenience of Gastransmission A/S due to operational considerations or due to the Supplier’s already committed program - this will be agreed with the Supplier. The number and scope of runs will be determined after entry of contract. The intelligent pig surveys will be performed from different addresses in Denmark. Lot 2: Pigging Services 2026-2027 for Gas Storage Denmark A/S. Expected value: 805.000 EUR. Lot 2 applies to the following number of lines at the gas storage in Stenlille: 3.With MFL technology or alternatives/new technology: -Well Site B to Central Plant: 1 pipeline 12” (1.6 km) -Well Site D to Central Plant: 1 pipeline 12” (2.4 km) 4.With UT technology: -Well Site A & B: 8 x pipelines 6” (in average 60 m each) See Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2, for further information. The initially planned period of execution of pigging operations at Stenlille Gas Storage is May-June 2026. This period can be adjusted at the convenience of Gas Storage Denmark A/S due to operational considerations or due to the Supplier’s already committed program - this will be agreed with the Supplier. The number and scope of runs will be determined after entry of contract. But initially Gas Storage Denmark is planning to pig 4 x 6” pipelines in the 2026-campaign and 4 x 6” and 2 x 12” pipelines in the 2027-campaign. The intelligent pig survey will be performed at the Stenlille Gas Storage site. The tendered contracts have a duration from signing of the individual contract for each Lot until 31 December 2028 as the final date of completion of the Services under the specific contract. Each contract can be extended one (1) time for one (1) year until 31 December 2029. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. Tenders can be submitted for both Lots.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Solution Description
  • Contract Terms

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 1 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost for all lines (for evaluation purposes), cf. the Price List.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the following should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: General specification (doc. no. 21/03570-3) including chosen methods, proposed tools and proposed processes for all specified activities. Further the solution description should include: • A description of the lifting equipment, including: - Description of the launching and receiving procedure - Description of the equipment used • A presentation of the tenderer’s solution for a comparison report, acc. Section 4.7. “Reports” in Appendix 2: General specification, including: - comparison of indications to previous data - a check of the severity of all metal loss features against B31G • The tender should include a detailed HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solution description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: General specification (doc. no. 21/03570-3). That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: • Use of hydraulic lifting equipment will be preferred. It will have a positive weighting if the description is detailed and shows procedures with a high regard for safety and work environment. • It will have a positive weighting if the layout of the comparison report gives an easy and structured overview of the compared data and the data is relevant and of a high degree of quality and detail. • It will be evaluated positively that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which – considering the complexity of the scope covers: How risk assessments for the scope of work (health and safety) are conducted to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of the top five (5) risks identified for the scope of works. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms: • Contract Agreement for Pigging Services LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/00353-1) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 26/00353-2) The deviations should be enclosed in Appendix 0: Clarification List (doc. no. 26/00353-9) and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. Contract terms listed in section 3.7.1 are mandatory parts and deviations to these are not accepted. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the listed competitive elements and the evaluation of “contract terms” will be based on the deviations. It should be noted that any deviation might impact the score as this is dependent on the content, clarity and consequence of the deviation. The following elements are considered competitive elements: • Contract Agreement – LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/002353-1): - Clause 4 – Miscellaneous - Clause 5 - Contract Data (except the mandatory areas mentioned in 3.7.1) - Clause – 6 Entry into force and term • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services – LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/00353-2), and where relevant same Clauses in the Contract Agreement: - Clause 6 – Supplier’s Personnel, Equipment, Materials and Suppliers - Clause 7 – Delivery of Services - Clause 8 – Time of Delivery - Clause 10 – Intellectual property rights - Clause 11 – Late-delivery or non-delivery - Clause 12 – Defects and remedies - Clause 13 – Limitation of liability - Clause 14 - Product Liability towards Customer - Clause – 15 Insurance - Clause 16 – Indemnification - Clause 19 – Code of Conduct, HSE and sustainability requirements - Clause 21 – Assignment of rights - Clause 24 – Termination - Clause 25 – Termination for convenience - Appendix 1E – Code of Conduct for Business Partners Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of ten (10) will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
  • Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 2 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost for all lines (for evaluation purposes), cf. the Price List.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the following should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: General specification (doc. no. 21/03570-3) including chosen methods, proposed tools and proposed processes for all specified activities. Further the solution description should include: • A description of the lifting equipment, including: - Description of the launching and receiving procedure - Description of the equipment used • A presentation of the tenderer’s solution for a comparison report, acc. Section 4.7. “Reports” in Appendix 2: General specification, including: - comparison of indications to previous data - a check of the severity of all metal loss features against B31G • The tender should include a detailed HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment • A description of the tenderer’s proposed solution regarding Tool performance. The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solution description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: General specification (doc. no. 21/03570-3). That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: • Use of hydraulic lifting equipment will be preferred. It will have a positive weighting if the description is detailed and shows procedures with a high regard for safety and work environment. • It will have a positive weighting if the layout of the comparison report gives an easy and structured overview of the compared data and the data is relevant and of a high degree of quality and detail. • It will be evaluated positively that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which – considering the complexity of the scope covers: How risk assessments for the scope of work (health and safety) are conducted to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of the top 5 (five) risks identified for the scope of works. • It will have a positive weighting if the proposed solution demonstrates sufficient reliability for the following: o First run success > 98 % o Sensor reliability, sensor loss (DEF, MFL IDOD) < 0.5 % An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms: • Contract Agreement for Pigging Services LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/00354-2) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 26/00354-3) The deviations should be enclosed in Appendix 0: Clarification List (doc. no. 26/00354-14) and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. Contract terms listed in section 3.7.1 are mandatory parts and deviations to these are not accepted. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the listed competitive elements and the evaluation of “contract terms” will be based on the deviations. It should be noted that any deviation might impact the score as this is dependent on the content, clarity and consequence of the deviation. The following elements are considered competitive elements: • Contract Agreement – LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/002354-2): - Clause 4 – Miscellaneous - Clause 5 - Contract Data (except the mandatory areas mentioned in 3.7.1) - Clause – 6 Entry into force and term • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services – LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/00354-3), and where relevant same Clauses in the Contract Agreement: - Clause 6 – Supplier’s Personnel, Equipment, Materials and Suppliers - Clause 7 – Delivery of Services - Clause 8 – Time of Delivery - Clause 10 – Intellectual property rights - Clause 11 – Late-delivery or non-delivery - Clause 12 – Defects and remedies - Clause 13 – Limitation of liability - Clause 14 - Product Liability towards Customer - Clause – 15 Insurance - Clause 16 – Indemnification - Clause 19 – Code of Conduct, HSE and sustainability requirements - Clause 21 – Assignment of rights - Clause 24 – Termination - Clause 25 – Termination for convenience - Appendix 1E – Code of Conduct for Business Partners Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of ten (10) will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.

Beskrivelser af krav til deltagelse

  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfill the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfills it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of pre-qualification, be at least 180.000 EUR. Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 535.000 EUR. LOT 2: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 270.000 EUR. Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 805.000 EUR.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past 3 years as part of the application. By "undertaken in the past 3 years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting 3 years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the application, cf. section 2.3. LOT 1: The references should describe Pigging Services, and include: • A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including: • A description of the work carried out for each delivery. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables Energinet to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfill requirements comparable to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 - ex in volume and scope. • Works demonstrating experience with cleaning/gauging and MFL/Caliper combo tool incl. report • Services in naturel gas pipeline sizes from 12” to 30” with pig launcher • Pigging services in natural gas pipelines in gas • Contract value (if possible) • Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) LOT 2: The references should describe Pigging Services, and include: • A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including: • A description of the work carried out for each delivery. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables Energinet to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfill requirements comparable to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 - ex in volume and scope. • Works demonstrating experience with cleaning/gauging and MFL/Caliper/UT combo tool incl. report • Services in natural gas pipelines of the sizes 6” and 12” with and without pig launcher • Pigging services in natural gas pipelines in gas and in water • Contract value (if possible) • Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted to separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: • The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding MFL Pigging services. LOT 2: • The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding MFL Pigging. • The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding UT Pigging Services.

Oplyste optioner

  • 1 option on pigging of 2 x 12" pipelines for Energinet Gastransmission A/S
  • 1 year extension of contract untill 31.12.2029

Udbudsmateriale

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.