Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED335420-2026

Installation of pipes with horizontal directional drilling (HDD) under Guldborgsund and Roskilde Fjord - 23/03722

Ordregiver
Energinet Eltransmission A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
147.000.000 DKK
Frist
—
Publiceret
18.5.2026
CPV
45120000, 45262422, 45231600, 45314300
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase horizontal directional drilling activities including installation of PE-pipes for establishing two sets of cable crossings for new 145 kV cable sys-tems and fiber connections across Guldborgsund (two pipe sets, two cable systems, LOT 1) and Roskilde Fjord (one pipe set, one cable system, LOT 2). The underground power cables will be installed by another Contractor by means of Watucab by utilizing the smaller pipes inside a bigger pipe. The Fibre Optical Cables (FOC) will be installed in dedicated pipes for this purpose. This tender concerns all pipes involved – both the smaller pipes and the bigger pipe on the outside. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. The value of the contracts is expected to amount to total 147 Mio. DKK The tender is divided into the following lots: Lot 1: Cable crossings for new 145 kV cable systems and fiber connections across Guldborgsund. Two pipe sets, two power cable systems oPipe #1 from Falster to Lolland. Estimated length 1,254 m oPipe #2 from Falster to Lolland. Estimated length 1,207 m Lot 2: Cable crossings for new 145 kV cable systems and fiber connections across Roskilde Fjord: One pipe set, one power cable system oPipe #1 from Roskilde Fjord West – East landings. Estimated length 1,755 m Tenders can be submitted for one or all partial agreements

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • Price Prices must be stated in the attached Schedule of Prices and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclu-sive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will eval-uate the total cost - Total Tender Price, cf. Schedule of Prices.
  • Technical solution Technical description The evaluation will be based on the submitted technical description, including method statements specifications and descriptions which demonstrate the technical level for executing the works specified in the tender documents. The work shall be based on a tender engineering ap-proach ensuring that that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteristics differ from the expected. The tenderer must include Method Statements and engineering reports from the Pre-FEED covering all phas-es of the Works. Reference is made to Technical Requirements (doc. no. 23/03722-1) The evaluation will be based on the degree of detail and the technical level of specifications and the level of content in the Method Statement(s). It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer submits detailed descriptions that in content and clarity demonstrate fulfil-ment of all technical requirements stated in the tender documents. Further, it will be evaluated positive that the approach and chosen solutions underline the tenderer’s ability and use of competences to execute the works, es-pecially concerning: • Assessment of technical and environmental risks and proposed mitigations • Quality plan • Method statements • Engineering document proving that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteris-tics differ from the expected • Contingency plans for handling blow-outs • Specification of specialized equipment and drilling rigs and drilling bits, including considerations con-cerning redundancy of key equipment • Specification of materials to be used • Specification of PE pipe configuration • Specification of the PE pipes proposed. • Specification of drilling mud • Specification of seals • State the anticipated amount of water for per-forming the drilling • Preliminary drawings of drilling profile • Specifications of working areas Specification of onshore spread
  • Organization As the Works is of immense importance for the Client, the tenderer must enclose CVs of the key personnel who will be allocated to the Works. The following are considered as key personnel: • Project manager • Site staff foreman • HSE responsible • H&S Coordinator (AMK-B) • Quality Manager The tenderer is encouraged to highlight only the expertise and experience for each key personnel relevant for the position in the respective CVs (e.g. educational back-ground, experience within that position, experience with similar assignments etc.). Further, the tenderer should submit an Organization Plan. The Organization Plan should include a detailed description of the project specific organizational struc-ture down to site staff foreman level which will be allocated to the Works during all phases of the Works. The Organization Plan description should describe: • The overall structure, including hierarchy and procedures for escalation. • Lines of communication, internally and external-ly • Interfaces towards the Contracting Authority. • How the tenderer will secure coverage of all po-sitions at all time The Organization Plan must be described in detail as well as visualized in a project specific organization chart. The evaluation of key personnel will be based on the degree to which the experience and professional qualifications of the individual key personnel is up to date, relevant in respect of the performance and position of the specific assignment. As such a relevant educational background combined with relevant roles in recent projects of similar characteristics will be evaluated positively. Further, the evaluation will focus on to which degree the individual key personnel will be involved in the fulfilment of the assignment and how the key personnel complement each other. The evaluation of the Organization Plan will be based on the degree of detail and • On whether the proposed plan is project specific, operational, efficient, robust and with clear lines of communication. • On whether the organization is well-structured with coverage for all interfaces taking into consid-eration the complexity of the Works • On the coverage of all positions and possibility to scall in manpower during execution in order to ful-fil the project time schedule An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • Time Schedule for the Works The tenderer should include the Project Time Schedule in the tender. The Project Time Schedule must be project specific and include all activities executed by the tenderer concerning the Works. The tenderer should as part of the sub-criteria include a detailed and robust time schedule for each lot which outlines how the works will be structured through FEED and Detailed Engineering, construction and pipe installation phases, and delivery of as-built documentation. Delays associated with inspections and verifications shall be made clear, if known. The time schedule should contain relevant project milestones including the milestones outlined in the tender documents. Reference is made to the Time Schedule for the relevant LOT (LOT 1: 23/03722-34 or LOT 2: 23/03722-35). The time schedule should be included both in the form of a chart (GANTT-diagram) with clarifications as needed, in a supporting and elaborate description. The evaluation of the Time Schedule will be based on the level of detail and robustness/timeliness for all phases of the Works. The evaluation of the detailed Project Time Schedule pre-pared by the tenderer and included in the tender will be based on the degree of detail and division into sub-tasks to prove for the Employer, that the Contractor has the capacity to do the Works in accordance within the time frame specified in the Clients Time Schedule(s). The Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and ro-bust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out in the Tender Documents. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: - the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but front-loaded schedule for the critical activities - hazardous activities are not performed concurrently in the same location - the division into sub-sections ensures that the ten-derer has the capacity to perform in accordance with the overall project time schedule. the description and schedule reflect the tenderer’s ability to catch-up on delays and shows activities to activate
  • Contract terms For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms. The contract terms consist of: • Contract Agreement for Guldborgsund, doc.no. 23/03722-15 (lot 1) • Contract Agreement for Roskilde Fjord, doc.no. 23/03722-38 (lot 2) • Appendix 1 [General Conditions based on AB18], doc.no. 23/03722-16 (both lots) The deviations should be enclosed in the clarification list c.f. doc.no. 23/03722-6 and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The submitted clarification list should be clearly marked “Lot 1” or “Lot 2”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered contract must be performed on the basis of the contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the following listed competitive elements: - In the Contract Agreements, doc.no. 23/03722-15 (lot 1) and doc.no. 23/03722-38 (lot 2): • Section 5 [Contract Data] In terms of:  Liquidated damages and maximum liquidated damages (Clause 40, subclause (2)) under [Clause 40. The contractor’s liability in case of delay] - In Appendix 1 [General Conditions based on AB18], doc.no. 23/03722-16 (both lots): • Clause 12 [Services to be provided by the contractor] • Clause 26 [Obstacles] • Clause 31. Construction meetings • Chapter E [Extension of time and delay] • Chapter F [Handover] • Chapter G [Defects] • Clause 59 [The client’s right to terminate the contract] Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation for each lot will be made of this sub-criterion.
  • Technical solution The evaluation will be based on the submitted technical description, including method statements specifications and descriptions which demonstrate the technical level for executing the works specified in the tender docu-ments. The work shall be based on a tender engineering ap-proach ensuring that that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteristics differ from the expected. The tenderer must include Method Statements and engineering reports from the Pre-FEED covering all phas-es of the Works. Reference is made to Technical Requirements (doc. no. 23/03722-1) The evaluation will be based on the degree of detail and the technical level of specifications and the level of content in the Method Statement(s). It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer submits detailed descriptions that in content and clarity demonstrate fulfil-ment of all technical requirements stated in the tender documents. Further, it will be evaluated positive that the approach and chosen solutions underline the tenderer’s ability and use of competences to execute the works, es-pecially concerning: • Assessment of technical and environmental risks and proposed mitigations • Quality plan • Method statements • Engineering document proving that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteris-tics differ from the expected • Contingency plans for handling blow-outs • Specification of specialized equipment and drilling rigs and drilling bits, including considerations con-cerning redundancy of key equipment • Specification of materials to be used • Specification of PE pipe configuration • Specification of the PE pipes proposed. • Specification of drilling mud • Specification of seals • State the anticipated amount of water for per-forming the drilling • Preliminary drawings of drilling profile • Specifications of working areas Specification of onshore spread
  • Organization As the Works is of immense importance for the Client , the tenderer must enclose CVs of the key personnel who will be allocated to the Works. The following are considered as key personnel: • Project manager • Site staff foreman • HSE responsible • H&S Coordinator (AMK-B) • Quality Manager The tenderer is encouraged to highlight only the expertise and experience for each key personnel relevant for the position in the respective CVs (e.g. educational back-ground, experience within that position, experience with similar assignments etc.). Further, the tenderer should submit an Organization Plan. The Organization Plan should include a detailed description of the project specific organizational structure down to site staff foreman level which will be allocated to the Works during all phases of the Works. The Organization Plan description should describe: • The overall structure, including hierarchy and procedures for escalation. • Lines of communication, internally and external-ly • Interfaces towards the Contracting Authority. • How the tenderer will secure coverage of all po-sitions at all time The Organization Plan must be described in detail as well as visualized in a project specific organization chart. The evaluation of key personnel will be based on the degree to which the experience and professional qualifications of the individual key personnel is up to date, relevant in respect of the performance and position of the specific assignment. As such a relevant educational background combined with relevant roles in recent projects of similar char-acteristics will be evaluated positively. Further, the evaluation will focus on to which degree the individual key personnel will be involved in the fulfilment of the assignment and how the key personnel complement each other. The evaluation of the Organization Plan will be based on the degree of detail and • On whether the proposed plan is project specific, operational, efficient, robust and with clear lines of communication. • On whether the organization is well-structured with coverage for all interfaces taking into consideration the complexity of the Works • On the coverage of all positions and possibility to scall in manpower during execution in order to fulfil the project time schedule An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion
  • Time Schedule for the Works The tenderer should include the Project Time Schedule in the tender. The Project Time Schedule must be project specific and include all activities executed by the tenderer concerning the Works. The tenderer should as part of the sub-criteria include a detailed and robust time schedule for each lot which outlines how the works will be structured through FEED and Detailed Engineering, construction and pipe installation phases, and delivery of as-built documentation. Delays associated with inspections and verifications shall be made clear, if known. The time schedule should contain relevant project milestones including the milestones outlined in the tender documents. Reference is made to the Time Schedule for the relevant LOT (LOT 1: 23/03722-34 or LOT 2: 23/03722-35). The time schedule should be included both in the form of a chart (GANTT-diagram) with clarifications as needed, in a supporting and elaborate description. The evaluation of the Time Schedule will be based on the level of detail and robustness/timeliness for all phases of the Works. The evaluation of the detailed Project Time Schedule prepared by the tenderer and included in the tender will be based on the degree of detail and division into sub-tasks to prove for the Employer, that the Contractor has the capacity to do the Works in accordance within the time frame specified in the Clients Time Schedule(s). The Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out in the Tender Documents. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: - the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but front-loaded schedule for the critical activities - hazardous activities are not performed concurrently in the same location - the division into sub-sections ensures that the tenderer has the capacity to perform in accordance with the overall project time schedule. the description and schedule reflect the tenderer’s ability to catch-up on delays and shows activities to activate

Beskrivelser af krav til deltagelse

  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: • Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time limit for receipt of tenders, be at least 28 mill. DKK/3,753 mill. EUR • Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the tenderer can qualify if Equity exceeds 85,75 mill. DKK/ 11,494 mill. EUR
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past 5 years as part of the application. By “com-parable” it is understood more than 800 m length of horizontal directional drilling involving 100 tons (Thrust/pull-back tension: 1000 kN) or bigger. By "undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. Ref-erences older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the application, cf. section 2.3. The references should describe horizontal directional drilling activities, and include:  A specific description of deliveries, including: • Type and scope of HDD works o Length and diameter of pipe installed via HDD o Description of installed pipe/cable and/or casing solution o Size of drilling rig(s) involved • Hydro‑geological and environmental conditions o Description of ground conditions encountered (e.g. clay, sand, moraine, rock, mixed soils) o Sensitivity of the surrounding environment (e.g. Natura 2000, pro-tected areas, environmental restrictions) • Quality, HSE and documentation o Applied quality assurance and control measures o Compliance with HSE requirements during drilling under marine waters o As‑built documentation, drilling logs and completion reports • Contractual role and performance o Contractor’s role (main contractor / subcontractor) o Time schedule compliance and handling of unforeseen ground conditions o Reference contact details and year of completion • Contact information o Specification of buying organization, contact person and the asso-ciated contact information  Contract value (if possible)  Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibilities may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of eco-nomic operators the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: • At least two references for horizontal directional drilling of a length of more than 800 meters installing Ø500 PE pipes or larger within the last 5 years. • Listing of drilling rigs of 100 tons (Thrust/pull-back tension: 1000 kN) and above that are relevant for the installation under tender • Proven record for work in nature preservation areas like Natura 2000, protected areas, environmentally restricted areas or similar. • Proven experience from previous projects with the use of Bentonite products, additives and other drilling fluid products for HDD equivalent to the products listed in Appendix 2E-1 and Appendix 2E-2.
  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators. Minimum requirement: LOT 2: • Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time limit for receipt of tenders, be at least 20 mill. DKK/2,681 mill. EUR • Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the tenderer can qualify if Equity exceeds 61,25 mill. DKK/8,210 mill. EUR
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past 5 years as part of the application. By “com-parable” it is understood more than 800 m length of horizontal directional drilling involving 100 tons (Thrust/pull-back tension: 1000 kN) or bigger. By "undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. Ref-erences older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the application, cf. section 2.3. The references should describe horizontal directional drilling activities, and include:  A specific description of deliveries, including: • Type and scope of HDD works o Length and diameter of pipe installed via HDD o Description of installed pipe/cable and/or casing solution o Size of drilling rig(s) involved • Hydro‑geological and environmental conditions o Description of ground conditions encountered (e.g. clay, sand, mo-raine, rock, mixed soils) o Sensitivity of the surrounding environment (e.g. Natura 2000, pro-tected areas, environmental restrictions) • Quality, HSE and documentation o Applied quality assurance and control measures o Compliance with HSE requirements during drilling under marine waters o As‑built documentation, drilling logs and completion reports • Contractual role and performance o Contractor’s role (main contractor / subcontractor) o Time schedule compliance and handling of unforeseen ground conditions o Reference contact details and year of completion • Contact information o Specification of buying organization, contact person and the asso-ciated contact information  Contract value (if possible)  Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibilities may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of eco-nomic operators the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: • At least two references for horizontal directional drilling of a length of more than 800 meters installing Ø500 PE pipes or larger within the last 5 years. • Listing of drilling rigs of 100 tons (Thrust/pull-back tension: 1000 kN) and above that are relevant for the installation under tender • Proven record for work in nature preservation areas like Natura 2000, protected are-as, environmentally restricted areas or similar. • Proven experience from previous projects with the use of Bentonite products, addi-tives and other drilling fluid products for HDD equivalent to the products listed in Ap-pendix 2E-1 and Appendix 2E-2.

Udbudsmateriale

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.