Retender regarding a digital wayfinding solution for The University of Southern Denmark
- Ordregiver
- Syddansk Universitet
- Oplyst værdi / estimat
- 1.800.000 DKK
- Frist
- —
- Publiceret
- 20.7.2026
- Leveringssted (NUTS)
- DK031, DNK
Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.
Vinderlisten dækker bekendtgørelsen. Denne visning har ikke en sikker kobling mellem hver vinder, delkontrakt, værdi og udløbsdato. Se originalen for fordelingen.
Beløb er offentliggjorte værdier i bekendtgørelser og kan omfatte flere delkontrakter, rammeaftalelofter og estimater. De viser ikke faktisk omsætning eller forbrug. Valutaer summeres hver for sig uden omregning. Manglende beløb er ikke nul. Se datagrundlag og metode.
Procedure og udbudsmateriale
Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.
Proceduretype (kildens kode)
- neg-w-call
Tildelingskriterier
- Pris
- Quality 1: User friendliness of the digital wayfinding
- Quality 2: Functionality of the digital wayfinding
- Quality 3: Non functional requirements
Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier
- The tenderer must submit prices as requested in the Schedule of prices (Annex 2). The tender must be submitted in Danish Kroner (DKK), exclusive of VAT, but including all other fees. The price that is included in the evaluation will be the total price, cf. Annex 2.
- The schedule in the tender specifications describes several user scenarios. Tenderer must for each user scenario in its tender include a video or a description for the specific scenario in accordance with the schedule. To evaluating the criterion, the contracting authority has submitted a committee of expected users and map editors for the system. Based on committee’s experience from the videos and/or descriptions an appointed committee at SDU will assess the systems’ user friendliness and intuitiveness. Positive weighting is placed on at system being intuitive and having a clear layout. With the system being intuitive, we mean e.g. by using common visual cues (e.g. such as colors and icons), and/or the System is designed in a way that makes it easy for users to learn and remember how the system works, to ensure an experience that feels intuitive. Features and navigation should - to the highest possible extent - be self-explanatory (e.g. by having support features such as mouse-over information, for further guidance), and the design should be consistent. In the absence of a video or description the grade 0 is given for the scenario in question.
- Annex 1 Specification of requirements, section 3.2. and 3.3 describes several wishes for functionality and the associated minimum requirements. The fulfilment of the requirements in sections 3.2 and 3.3 is generally evaluated by assessing whether each Wish has been met or not. If a Wish is met in the tenderer’s offer, it is awarded 10 points in accordance with section 2.5.2. If the Wish is not met, it is awarded 0 points. Where the wishes in these two sections state “It will be viewed positively if…”, the evaluation will be based on the extent to which the fulfilment is deemed to meet what is considered positive for the specific wish. The evaluation will be carried out according to the method described in section 2.6.2 or after the scale stated in the wish, if one as such is to be found in the wish. All wishes carry equal weight. This means that the average score awarded for the fulfilment of the wishes will be included in the overall evaluation of the tender with the weighting assigned to “Quality 2 …” in the table above.
- The fulfilment of the wishes in sections 3.4 and 3.5 is generally evaluated by assessing whether each wish has been met or not. If a wish is met in the tenderer’s offer, it is awarded 10 points in accordance with section 2.5.2. If the wish is not met, it is awarded 0 points. Where the wishes in these two sections state “It will be viewed positively if…”, the evaluation will be based on the extent to which the fulfilment is deemed to meet what is considered positive for the specific wish. The evaluation will be carried out according to the method described in section 2.6.2 or after the scale stated in the wish, if one as such is to be found in the wish. All wishes carry equal weight. This means that the average score awarded for the wishes will be included in the overall evaluation of the tender with the weighting assigned to “Quality 3 …” in the table above.
Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori
Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.
- BBG-BEF.02 - Udførelse af referencemålinger
Vejdirektoratet
- Digital ortho photos of forest areas
Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet
- Landinspektør – og landmålerydelse
DIN Forsyning A/S
- Rammeaftale screening af markblokke og tilhørende korttemaer
Styrelsen for Grøn Arealomlægning og Vandmiljø
- Genudbud Rammeaftale screening af markblokke og tilhørende korttemaer
Styrelsen for Grøn Arealomlægning og Vandmiljø
- DIS-IHK-AG - Dynamisk Indkøbssystem: In house-konsulenter til arealerhvervelse, GIS, CAD, kortlægning og ledninger
Vejdirektoratet