Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED600889-2026

Purchase of Sleeves, Split Tees incl. Hot Tapping and Stopple Services and Methane Re-compression Services - 25/18597

Ordregiver
Energinet
Oplyst værdi / estimat
12.500.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
1.9.2026
CPV
76000000, 76600000, 76510000, 50514300, 60300000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority intends to procure components and associated services for Energinet’s gas-related infrastructure and facilities. The tender consists of two separate Framework Agreements: •LOT 1 - Purchase of Sleeves, Split Tees incl. Hot Tapping and Stopple Services •LOT 2 - Methane Re-compression Services For each LOT, the Contracting Authority intends to award Framework Agreements to two Suppliers. The Framework Agreements have a duration of eight (8) years and may be terminated by either Party upon six (6) months' written notice, cf. section 9.3 of the applicable Framework Agreement. The Framework Agreements are intended to support operations, maintenance activities and projects concerning Energinet’s gas-related infrastructure and facilities. Energinet Gastransmission A/S is expected to award the majority of subsequent contracts under the Framework Agreements. The Framework Agreements may also be used by other subsidiaries within the Energinet Group in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Framework Agreement. It is expected that the Framework Agreements will primarily be used by Energinet Gastransmission A/S and Gas Storage Denmark A/S. The Framework Agreements may also be used by Energinet Brint A/S should a relevant need arise during the term of the Framework Agreements. The estimated and maximum values of each LOT are stated below. The estimates have been calculated based on historical consumption combined with the anticipated requirements during the term of the Framework Agreements. The stated consumption figures and values are estimates only and are therefore not binding on the Contracting Authority. During the term of the Framework Agreements, the Contracting Authority has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the goods and services covered by the Framework Agreements from the selected Suppliers, cf. section 1.3 of the applicable Framework Agreement.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Solution description
  • Delivery Time
  • Contract Terms
  • Solution Description

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • Prices must be stated in the attached Appendix 3: Price List LOT 1 and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate (for evaluation purposes) the following cells in the Evaluation Sheet of the Price List; Cell D5 - the total cost of Split Tees (Items 1.1-1.11 in Components Sheet), Cell D6 - the total cost of Full Encirclement Repair Sleeves (Items 2.1-2.11 in Components Sheet), Cell D7 - the total cost of Standard Service Packages (Items 3.1-3.11 in Services Sheet), Cell D8 - the total cost of Standby Days (Items 4.1-4.11 in Services Sheet), Cell D9 - the total cost of Additional Operations and Additional Work (Items 5.1-5.6 in Services Sheet), Cell D10 - the total cost of Inline Isolation Services (Items 6.1-6.11 in Services Sheet) and D11 - the total cost of Initial Order (Items 7.1-7.16/7.TOTAL in Initial Order Sheet) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Split Tees (15%) - Full Encirclement Repair Sleeves (5%) - Standard Service Packages (15%) - Standby Days (5%) - Additional Operations and Additional Work (5%) - Inline Isolation Services (5%) - Initial Order (50%)
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the below should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1. Further the solution description should include: 1. A detailed inspection report with a description of inspec-tion of all equipment necessary for the Service, including • Place and date of inspection • Status for equipment 2. A description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2, section 14. The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1. That is to which extent the detailed solution descrip-tion demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • It will be evaluated positively if there is a struc-tured procedure for inspection of the tools at Sup-plier’s base – prior to shipment to Denmark • It will be evaluated positively if the inspection pro-cedure ensures that all equipment is in working condition before the Service is initiated 2. • It will be evaluated positively if the description demonstrates a well-structured procedure for conducting task-specific training and instruction of operators and crews, ensuring that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is complet-ed before the operators and crews arrive on site. Solution description (40 %) continued Documentation Evaluation 3. A Technical & Cost proposal related to the Works in the Base Case described in Appendix A to the Scope of Works LOT 1, focusing on: - A Technical & Cost proposal, as described in section 8.3 of the Scope of Works LOT 1. - A process description for setting up and disman-tling of equipment on site - A detailed HSE Plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment. 3. • It will be evaluated positively if the Technical & Cost proposal contains a well-structured and de-tailed description of the Works and includes draw-ings relevant for the identified Works and equip-ment. • It will be evaluated positively if the process de-scription sets out a clear process for setting up and dismantling equipment in the most time-efficient manner. • It will be evaluated positively if the Tenderer sub-mits a proactive and detailed HSE Plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which, taking account of the complexity of the scope, describes how health and safety risks for the Works are assessed to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of the five (5) most significant risks for the Works. Response must be filled out in Template 5: Mandatory Response Sheet for Solution Description and Delivery Time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the Tenderer must state the Offered Delivery Time for the Initial Order in accordance with section 1.5.2 and the Price List LOT 1. The Offered Delivery Time must be stated as a whole number of calendar weeks and must cover the period from entering into the Agreement on the Initial Order until delivery of all Components included in the Initial Order. The sub-criterion "Delivery Time" will be evaluated based on the Tenderer's offered delivery time for the Initial Order as described in section 1.5.2. The evaluation will be based on the whole number of calendar weeks stated by the Tenderer in Template 5: Mandatory Response Sheet for Solution Description and Delivery Time (doc. no. 25/18597-37) An Offered Delivery Time of 18 weeks or less is awarded a score of 10, whereas an Offered Delivery Time of 35 is awarded a score of 0. Additional points are awarded by using a linear interpolation between the above two points (18 and 35). The scores will be given as follows: Offered Delivery Time (whole calendar weeks) Evaluation score (0–10) 18 10,00 19 9,41 20 8,82 21 8,24 22 7,65 23 7,06 24 6,47 25 5,88 26 5,29 27 4,71 28 4,12 29 3,53 30 2,94 31 2,35 32 1,76 33 1,18 34 0,59 35 0,00 36 Non-compliant Response must be filled out in Template 5: Mandatory Response Sheet for Solution Description and Delivery Time. Beware that an Offered Delivery Time of 36 weeks or more will be considered non-compliant.
  • The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-4) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-5) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-6) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-4) • Clause 2 – Contract Documents • Clause 6 - Confidentiality • Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-5) • Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement • Clause 7 – Contract data, Appendix 1D (Labour Clause) In General Terms and Conditions for Services LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11959-6) • Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment • Clause 20 - Confidentiality • Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) • Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law • Appendix 1D (Labour Clause) • Appendix 1E – Code of Conduct for Business Partners • Appendix 1F – Code of Conduct Contract Clause, doc. no. 26/11959-7 which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • Prices must be stated in the attached Appendix 3: Price List LOT 2 and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate (for evaluation purposes) the following cells in the Evaluation Sheet of the Price List; Cell D5 - the total cost of Methane Re-compression Service (Item 1.1), Cell D6 - the total cost of Standby Days (Item 2.1) and Cell D7 - the total cost of Additional Work (Items 3.1-3.4) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Methane Re-compression Service (70%) - Standby Days (15%) - Additional Work (15%)
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the below should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2. Further the solution description should include: 1. A detailed HSE Plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solution description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • It will be evaluated positively if the Tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE Plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which, taking account of the complexity of the scope, describes how health and safety risks for the Works are assessed to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of the five (5) most significant risks for the Works. Solution description (50 %) continued Documentation Evaluation 2. A detailed inspection report with a description of inspection of all equipment necessary for the Service, including • Place and date of inspection • Status for equipment 2. • It will be evaluated positively if there is a structured procedure for inspection of the tools at Supplier’s base – prior to shipment to Denmark • It will be evaluated positively if the inspection procedure ensures that all equipment is in working condition before the Service is initiated 3. A description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2, section 13. 3. • It will be evaluated positively if the description demonstrates a well-structured procedure for conducting task-specific training and instruction of operators and crews, ensuring that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is completed before the operators and crews arrive on site. 4. A Technical & Cost proposal related to the Works in the Base Case described in Appendix A to the Scope of Works LOT 2, focusing on: • A Technical & Cost proposal, as described in section 8.2 of the Scope of Works LOT 2. • A process description for setting up and dismantling of equipment on site 4. • It will be evaluated positively if the Technical & Cost proposal contains a well-structured and detailed description of the Works and includes drawings relevant for the identified Works and equipment. • It will be evaluated positively if the process description sets out a clear process for setting up and dismantling equipment in the most time-efficient manner. Response must be filled out in Template 5: Mandatory Response Sheet for Solution Description and Delivery Time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/11960-2) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/11960-3) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/11960-4) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 1 (doc. no. 26/11960-2) • Clause 2 – Contract Documents • Clause 6 - Confidentiality • Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/11960-3) • Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement • Clause 7 – Contract data, Appendix 1D (Labour Clause) In General Terms and Conditions for Services LOT 2 (doc. no. 26/11960-4) • Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment • Clause 20 - Confidentiality • Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) • Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law • Appendix 1 D (Labour Clause) • Appendix 1E – Code of Conduct for Business Partners • Appendix 1F – Code of Conduct Contract Clause LOT 2, doc. no. 26/11960-5 which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.

Beskrivelser af krav til deltagelse

  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (and currency) (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities (e.g., an affiliated company or a sub-contractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g., a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfils the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfils it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of pre-qualification, be at least 1.500.000 EUR. Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 15 pct.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to five (5) most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past five (5) years as part of the application for each LOT. By "undertaken in the past five (5) years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting five (5) years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. LOT 1: The references should describe purchase of sleeves and split tees incl. hot tapping and stopple operations, and include: • A specific description for each reference, including: • A description of the Works carried out for each delivery/job. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables the Contracting Authority to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfil requirements comparable to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 for LOT 1 - ex in volume and scope. • Works performed demonstrating experience with;  Hot tapping operations  Stopple operations  Stopple insulation  Or a combination of these • Description of the following data regarding the performed operations:  Pressure  Pipe diameter  Bypass diameter  Duration of the operation in days • Delivery of sleeves and split tees incl. description of:  Amount of units • Contract value (if possible) • Customer/entity (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery for the specific Works/job – not project (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. The Contracting Authority has attached “Template 4: Optional Response Sheet for ESPD references” for filling out the references in instead of in the ESPD. The applicant is encouraged to use the template, but it is not a requirement. References are to be filled out only in one form – the ESPD itself or the template. If references are filled out both in ESPD and in template, only the references in the ESPD itself will be taken into consideration. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed five (5) for each LOT when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted to separate ESPD’s for each entity.
  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (and currency) (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities (e.g., an affiliated company or a sub-contractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g., a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfils the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfils it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 2: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 600.000 EUR. Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 15 pct.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to five (5) most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past five (5) years as part of the application for each LOT. By "undertaken in the past five (5) years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting five (5) years backwards from the submission date for prequalifi-cation. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. LOT 2: The references should describe re-compression services, and include: • A specific description for each reference, including: • A description of the Works carried out for each delivery/job. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables the Contracting Authority to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfil requirements compara-ble to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 for LOT 2 - ex in volume and scope. • Works performed demonstrating experience with;  Re-compression services • Description of the following regarding the performed operations:  Necessary tools  Equipment and personnel  Max pressure of compressor  The lowest pressure the pipe was delivered with after the service  Duration of the operation in days  How many Nm3 was moved during operations  Time it took to setup and dismantle at operations site • Contract value (if possible) • Customer/entity (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery for the specific Works/job – not project (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. The Contracting Au-thority has attached “Template 4: Optional Response Sheet for ESPD references” for filling out the references in instead of in the ESPD. The applicant is encouraged to use the template, but it is not a requirement. References are to be filled out only in one form – the ESPD itself or the template. If references are filled out both in ESPD and in template, only the references in the ESPD itself will be taken into considera-tion. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed five (5) for each LOT when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted to separate ESPD’s for each entity.

Udbudsmateriale

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.