Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED758579-2025

Procurement of 3 noise reduction silencers including installation for Fjernvarme Fyns waste incineration lines 11, 12 and 13

Ordregiver
FJERNVARME FYN AFFALDSENERGI A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
6.000.000 DKK
Frist
—
Publiceret
17.11.2025
CPV
42300000, 42390000, 45300000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DK031, DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Tildeling

Vinderlisten dækker bekendtgørelsen. Denne visning har ikke en sikker kobling mellem hver vinder, delkontrakt, værdi og udløbsdato. Se originalen for fordelingen.

Bekendtgørelsens samlede værdi: 6.000.000 DKK
Vinder ikke oplyst
Oplyst værdi: 6.000.000 DKK

Beløb er offentliggjorte værdier i bekendtgørelser og kan omfatte flere delkontrakter, rammeaftalelofter og estimater. De viser ikke faktisk omsætning eller forbrug. Valutaer summeres hver for sig uden omregning. Manglende beløb er ikke nul. Se datagrundlag og metode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to procure 3 new silencers placed in front of the stack to get a noise reduction if we run through or bypass the fluegas condesations units. The procurement is conducted as a negotiated procedure with prior call for competition pursuant to the EU Utilities Directive (Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC).

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Technical Solution and performance
  • HSE

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • The Contracting Authority assigns points for “Price” as follows: Price is scored on a linear scale from 0 to 10. The tender with the lowest total price will be given the highest score, 10. The lowest total price is understood as the lowest calculated total price based on the Tenderlist (Annex 2) among all compliant tenders. All other tenders are then scored on a linear scale, using the initial interpolation percentage, cf. the table 1 below, and as a result the tender with the lowest total price will be given the score 10 and a tender which is 50 % higher will be given the score 0. If 1 or more of the compliant tenders comprise a total price which is higher than the initial percentages stated in the table 1 below, The Contracting Authority will use the alternative linear scale with the same scores, but with a greater span. As a result, the span will be set at the actual difference in percentage between the lowest calculated total price among all compliant tenders and the highest calculated total price among all compliant tenders. The Contracting Authority will not expand beyond the stated maximum in Alternative 1 and as a result tenders which comprise a total price which is equal to or higher than this percentage will be scored 0. All scores from 0-10 may be used (including decimals). Table 1 – Interpolation percentage, inclusive alternative Initial interpolation percentage: +50 % Alternative 1 percentage(s): Highest compliant total price percentage above 50 % but below 75 % (maximum)
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed. All sub-sub criteria’s (1,2 and 3) will be evaluated equally in the total evaluation of this criterion: 1) The tenderer should include a detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. Accordingly, the following elements should be described in detail: • A detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. • Physical dimensions for each silencer and the appropriate construction especially considering access to service and maintenance for each silencer. The evaluation of the “Technical solution and access to service and maintenance” will be based on the tenderer’s description, and the Contracting Authority will in this respect emphasize that it is a reliable and robust solution, with an appropriate design and size that provides an easy way of conducting service and maintenance on each of the silencers. An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-sub-criterion. 2) Noise reduction As part of the evaluation, the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of noise reduction under current conditions. (See the attached noise measurement in the special conditions clause 3.1 and 3.2 and Annex G). The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1. The evaluation of noise reduction will be based on the stated level as offered by the tenderer for each silencer. The silencer with the lowest guaranteed dB will count for 50% of the evaluation of this sub-sub-criterion and the two other silencers will each count for 25% of the evaluation. If the same dB is offered on all 3 silencers they will all count the same. • A noise reduction level of 15.00 dB (Decibel) or higher will result in a score of 10 for this sub-sub criterion, whereas a performance level of 5.00 dB will result in a score of 0. In between these two points, scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered performance level below 5.00 dB on any of the silencers will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant. Example: Guaranteed noise reduction on Silencer 1: 9dB, Silencer 2: 10dB and silencer 3: 10 dB gives a weighed noise reduction of 9,50 dB (9,00 dB * 0,5 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 = 9,50 dB)which equals a score of 4,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals. 3) Pressure loss over silencers As part of the evaluation the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of pressure loss over the silencers. The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1. The evaluation of pressure loss over the silencers will be based on the average pressure loss level as offered by the tenderer. • An average pressure loss of 0.00 mbar (Millibar) will result in a score of 10, whereas a pressure loss of 5.00 mbar will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered level above 5.00 mbar on any of the lines will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant,. This is also the case even if the average pressure loss is below 5.00 mbar. Example: Guaranteed pressure loss on Silencer 1: 1,00 mbar, Silencer 2: 1,75 mbar and silencer 3: 2,50 mbar gives an average pressure loss of 1,75 mbar which equals a score of 6,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals.
  • For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the following should be enclosed: The tenderer should include a detailed HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment, including detailed descriptions of risk management, on-site supervision, inspections and audits. The evaluation will be based on the submitted HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) for the specific project. It will be evaluated positive that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which - considering the complexity and scope - covers: • Detailed description of how risk assessments for the specific scope of work (health and safety) are conducted to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of risks identified for the scope of work (dismantling and preparation for assembly including working at height etc.) • Detailed method statements which are relevant, safe to work by and show knowledge of the scope of work, especially considering dismantling and assembly of larger prefabricated parts (flue gas ducts, supports, insulation work etc.) An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-criterion.
Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.