LOT 1 - Variable Shunt Reactors for outdoor installation for SLF02 and NEA
- Ordregiver
- Energinet Eltransmission A/S
- Oplyst værdi / estimat
- 108.467.678 EUR
- Frist
- —
- Publiceret
- 12.3.2026
- Leveringssted (NUTS)
- DK032, DK031, DK022, DK021, DNK
Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.
Vinderlisten dækker bekendtgørelsen. Denne visning har ikke en sikker kobling mellem hver vinder, delkontrakt, værdi og udløbsdato. Se originalen for fordelingen.
Beløb er offentliggjorte værdier i bekendtgørelser og kan omfatte flere delkontrakter, rammeaftalelofter og estimater. De viser ikke faktisk omsætning eller forbrug. Valutaer summeres hver for sig uden omregning. Manglende beløb er ikke nul. Se datagrundlag og metode.
Procedure og udbudsmateriale
Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.
Proceduretype (kildens kode)
- neg-w-call
Tildelingskriterier
- Technical solution
- Sound level
- Contract Terms
- Price
Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier
- Prices must be stated in Appendix 3: Price List (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/03003-39) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost for each Lot individually, cf. the Appendix 3: Price lists (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/10093-39). The evaluation of prices for each Lot is based on “Total price” in EUR from row 17&18 and column G in sheet “Total Eval price for each Lot Prices must be stated in EU
- For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed: For each Lot the tenderer should include a technical solution description which - In detail describes the proposed solution (including design, components, processes, tools to be used etc.) and - Which demonstrates how and to which degree the competitive specifications as set out by the Contracting Authority, cf. the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093- 15 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26, are fulfilled, including any advantages elements. The tenderer should be thorough and precise when describing the technical solution, including technical advantages elements and level of fulfilment, as any insecurities and discrepancies may affect the evaluation negatively. Please note that all parts of the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26, concerning sound level, e.g. section 5.3.(sound enclosure), 11 and 13.3, will be evaluated as part of the sub-criteria “Sound level” and therefore will not be included in the evaluation of “Technical solution”. Further, please note that the elements marked in yellow in the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093- 16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26 are mandatory, cf. section 2.7.1 of the present Tender Conditions, and therefore are not included in the evaluation. In the evaluation of “Technical Solution”, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the detailed technical solution supports the delivery of high performing, well designed and robust reactors considering the scope and content of the assignment, cf. the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26. In this context, the elements listed below – and the fulfilment or lack thereof – are of particular importance: • General design - the overall technical solution for the shunt reactor design, including dimensions and accessibility. • Corrosion protection (cf. 5.5 Paint and surface treatment), including whether the protection level is higher or lower than C5vh and how all parts are treated. • Core type • Weight and Size, taking into consideration how this will affect the requirements for the foundations and stations • Tap changer (if applicable) and variation range (cf. 8. Tap Changer) • Oil type (physical characteristics such as sulphur) • Bushings (cf. 7. High-voltage connections and Bushings) • FAT- and SAT-procedure (cf. 6.5 Factory Acceptance Tests and Site Acceptance tests) The characteristics stated in the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26 are considered as an acceptable level of fulfilment. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria
- The evaluation will be based on a detailed and specific technical solution for the sound level, including: - Chosen methods, - Processes and tools for guaranteed sound power level. The evaluation of guaranteed sound level (cf. section 11. Sound Level in Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26is performed in 3 steps: Step 1): a. If the guaranteed sound power level is higher than the maximum value accepted the solution will be rejected as the minimum technical requirement is not fulfilled. b. If the guaranteed sound power level is equal to or lower than the maximum value accepted, the sound level is within an acceptable range - the score is preliminary set to a value of 5 (five), and the evaluation continues to step 2. Step 2): a. If NO external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the evaluation continues to step 3. b. If ANY external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the preliminary grade is reduced depending on the extent of the applied sound damping method: i. If Sound Panels (e.g., sandwich panels) are used, 3 (three) points will be deducted. ii. If Sound Screen is used, 3 (three) points will be deducted. iii. If Sound Housing is used, 5 (five) points will be deducted. (See note *) below for further description and definition of sound damping methods.) After the preliminary grade is reduced, the evaluation continues to step 3. Step 3): a. If sound power level is EQUAL TO the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the obtained preliminary score is the result of the evaluation. b. If sound power level is LOWER than the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the final score is obtained by adding 1 (one) point to the preliminary score for every dB the guaranteed sound power level is lower than the required maximum value. The final score cannot exceed the value 10 (ten), so no extra credit will be given for sound levels more than 10 dB lower than the maximum value. *) Note Definition of type of sound damping method (Step 2b i-iii). i. Sound Panels are panels attached directly to the tank wall, only partly covering one or more sides of the tank (e.g., sandwich panels). ii. Sound Screen is attached to the tank usually covering one or more complete sides. Typically, a screen is also installed with some centimetre distance between tank and screen, so valves, jacking points etc. must be accessed through hatches in the sound screen. iii. Sound Housing is an enclosure which surrounds the main tank, and it includes a roof. A sound house typically requires a separate or specially designed foundation.
- For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms: • Contract Agreement (doc. no. 24/10093-11, 24/10093- 21 and 24/10093-31), • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 24/10093-12), • Appendix 4 Time and Payment Schedule, (doc. no. 24/10093-20, 24/10093-30 and 24/10093-40) The deviations should be enclosed in the clarification list c.f. doc. no. 24/10093-10 and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. Contract terms listed in section 2.7.1 are mandatory parts and deviations to these are not accepted. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the listed competitive elements and the evaluation of “contract terms” will be based on the deviations. It should be noted that any deviation might impact the score as this is dependent on the content, clarity and consequence of the deviation. The following elements are considered competitive elements: • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase and, where relevant, same Clauses and Sub-Clauses in the Contract Agreements: o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for Sub-Clause 2.3, 2.5 and 2.6 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. Sub-Section 2.7.1 above) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 2.7.1 above) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) • Appendix 4: Time and Payment Schedules Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of 4 must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.
- Prices must be stated in Appendix 3: Price List (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/03003-39) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost for each Lot individually, cf. the Appendix 3: Price lists (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/10093-39). The evaluation of prices for each Lot is based on “Total price” in EUR from row 17&18 and column G in sheet “Total Eval price for each Lot Prices must be stated in EUR
Oplyste optioner
- The Agreement contains options regarding one (1) additional variable shunt reactor that Supplier is obligated to deliver
Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori
Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.
- Supplementary information regarding use of Achilles Utilities Nordics & Central Europe qualification system by Ørsted and Ørsted Group including the entities mentioned in section 1 and 2.1.4 General information
Ørsted Services A/S
- 50 kV 30MVAr Shunt Reactors
Nexel A/S
- Udbud af Dobbeltskinne indendørs 60 kV AIS-anlæg til station Drejebænken (Fyn)
VORES ELNET A/S
- Kvalifikationsordning - Entrepriseydelser ifm. etablering af luft-til-vand varmepumper til/for Kredsløb
Kredsløb Transmission A/S
- Kommende indkøb af to traktionstransformere til station Kassø / Upcoming procurement of two traction transformers for Kassø substation
Banedanmark
- Betalingsterminaler til DSB's billetautomater
DSB