Gå til hovedindhold
UdbudsScanner
Alle udbud
TED349400-2026

Gas Storage Denmark: Onshore Intervention Services related to wells on natural gas storage LOT 1-3: 2027-2034

Ordregiver
Gas Storage Denmark A/S
Oplyst værdi / estimat
4.360.000 EUR
Frist
—
Publiceret
21.5.2026
CPV
76000000, 76443000, 76300000, 76533000, 76100000, 76440000, 76510000, 76537000, 76110000
Leveringssted (NUTS)
DK022, DK050, DNK

Dataposten opdateret . Datakilder, dækning og beregningsmetode.

Beskrivelse
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase Onshore Intervention Services related to wells on natural gas storage for Gas Storage Denmark. The tendered framework agreement has a duration of 8 years with a possibility of termination with 6 months written notice, see section 9.3 in Framework Agreement (doc. no. 25/18898-5 for LOT 1, doc. no. 25/18899-3 for LOT 2 and doc. no. 25/18900-3 for LOT 3). The agreement is divided into the following lots: LOT 1: Gas Storage Denmark – Onshore Intervention Services - Reservoir logging and well diagnostics (25/18898) LOT 2: Gas Storage Denmark – Onshore Intervention Services - Wireline Intervention covering Slick line, E-line and Fishing operations (25/18899) LOT 3: Gas Storage Denmark – Onshore Intervention Services - Coil Tubing, Well testing, Fluid and Nitrogen pumping (25/18900) The Framework Agreements are to support all of GSD (all locations) and to support both operations and projects. In the upcoming years GSD will evaluate if projects and works involving CO2 and/or hydrogen storage will be pursued. The value of each lot is stated below. The amount is calculated based on historic consumption in combination with a prognosis for the upcoming 8 years. The estimated value for each LOT includes an estimated 3% price adjustment per year over the whole period. The consumption figures are estimates only and are consequently not binding for the Contracting Authority. During the specified period, the Contracting Authority has the right to purchase the services comprised by the framework agreement from the selected tenderer, but is not obligated to do so, cf. the framework sec. 1.3. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. Orientation Teams Meeting: A Microsoft Teams Orientation meeting regarding the application – including elaborations on chosen highlighted topics in the Tender Conditions will be conducted accordingly to the time schedule in section 1.2. Invitations to the meeting will be forwarded upon request via Comdia. Be aware that no technical questions will be answered at the meeting as this is purely an information meeting regarding the tender process. Site visit: As part of the preparation of applications for prequalification, it will be possible for applicants to visit Gas Storage Denmark’s two Sites in the time span indicated in the time schedule in section 1.2. Request to be forwarded via Comdia as soon as possible.

Procedure og udbudsmateriale

Oplysninger fra bekendtgørelsen kan dække flere delkontrakter. Listerne nedenfor er separate uddrag; rækkefølgen kobler ikke et kriterium til en beskrivelse eller delkontrakt. Kontrollér krav, vægtning, frister, optioner og eventuelle rettelser i originalmaterialet.

Proceduretype (kildens kode)

  • neg-w-call

Tildelingskriterier

  • Price
  • Solution Description
  • Contract Terms

Beskrivelser af tildelingskriterier

  • Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 1 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell F10), the total cost for Operations (Cell F27) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell F52) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Operations (50%) - Equipment, tools and operator (45%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.
  • SOLUTION DESCRIPTION DOCUMENTATION: For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the below should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 1. Further the solution description should include: 1. A description of the tenderer’s solution for a Petro Physical interpretation report based on Appendix 2A, section 11, Attachment F&G, including - proposed layout of logs and - description of compatibility with old log 2. Detailed description including a Technical & Cost pro-posal related to the Works as described in section 5.1 in Appendix 2, focusing on: - A Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific job 3. Description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 4. Description on handling of self-powered unit(s) related to the Works, focusing on: - Technical datasheet - Description of grounding requirements, stand-ards, instruction and how Tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. 5. Technical information on equipment supplied to Well site: - Type of wireline unit - Transport/delivery of lubricator and BOP. - Rig up of Equipment. 6. Tool specification, as described in section 6 in Appendix 2A (except 6.1.4 Perforation), covering well as detailed in Appendix 2A, Section 11, Attachment F. EVALUATION: The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 1. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • The interpretation report of the pulsed neutron logging data can combine the results with old data from previous logs • The layout of the report gives an easy overview of the combined data No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal description including a technical descrip-tion and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks, includ-ing methods for mitigating the risks, are specified to the Works, relevant, considered preventive and presented in a structured manner. 3. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specif-ic task training including instruction of opera-tors/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted be-fore the operators/crews arrive on site. 4. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors for the specific task including review of lo-cal information and documentation for installing temporary units on GSD site. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. 6. • A well-structured and detailed description of each tool proposed including a technical description and drawings. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-5) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-6) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-5) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-6) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.
  • Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 2 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will eval-uate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell F6), the total cost for Operations (Cell F26) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell F60) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Operations (50%) - Equipment, tools and operator (45%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.
  • DOCUMENTATION: For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the below should be enclosed: The tenderer should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 2. Further the solution description should include: 1. Detailed description related to the Works as described in section 1 and 2 in Appendix 2, using work case of Install/retrieve wire line set DHSV's. - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific Service 2. Description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 3. Description on handling of self-powered unit(s). - Technical datasheet - Description of grounding requirements, stand-ards, instruction and how tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. 4. Technical information on equipment supplied to Well site: - Type of wireline unit o Single or dual drum - Transport/delivery of lubricator and BOP. - Rig up of equipment. 5. Tool specification, as described in Appendix 2A, section 6, covering well as detailed in Appendix 2A, Section 11, Attachment E&F. 6. Description of mobilization upon receiving a work re-quest, including time schedule, which should include expected timespan for: - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks - Preparation of equipment - Mobilization to site in Denmark EVALUATION: The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 2. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal focusing on a technical description and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks, includ-ing methods for mitigating the risks, are specified to the Works, relevant, considered preventive and presented in a structured manner. No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specific task training including instruction of operators/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted before the operators/crews arrive on site 3. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors, that ensures that review of local legislation and documentation for installing temporary units on site is conducted. 4. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • A well-structured and detailed description of each tool proposed including a technical description and drawings. 6. • A well-structured and detailed description of each action. The expected timespan for each activity, including all relevant and necessary activities, is realistic. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-3) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-5) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-3) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-5) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evalua-tion of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the ten-derer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.
  • Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 3 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will eval-uate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell G11), the total cost for Personnel (Cell G33), the total cost for Operations (Cell G57) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell G99) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Personnel (35%) - Operations (30%) - Equipment, tools and operator (30%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.
  • DOCUMENTATION: For the evaluation of the sub-criterion the below should be enclosed: The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 3 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 3. Further the solution description should include: 1. Detailed description related to the Works as described in section 1 and 2 in Appendix 2, using “case for evaluation purpose” of cleaning sand fill above perforations out of well as on well, see Appendix 2A, section 11, Attachment E. - A Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific Works. 2. A detailed inspection report with a description of inspection of all equipment necessary for the Service, including - Place and date of inspection - Status for equipment 3. A description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 4. A description on handling of self-powered unit(s). (Coil unit, Pumping unit, Nitrogen unit. - Technical datasheet - A description of grounding requirements, standards, instruction and how tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. - Rig up of equipment. 5. A description of the required mixing and storage tanks that are supplied for the Works. 6. A description of well test package allowing to clean out and flow Gas well after sand cleanout. Low Noice Flare stack required as part of package 7. A description of mobilization upon receiving a work re-quest, including time schedule, which should include expected timespan for: - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks - Preparation of equipment - Mobilization to site in Denmark EVALUATION: The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 3 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 3. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal focusing on a technical description and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks including methods for mitigating the risks, are specified the Works, relevant, considered preventive and pre-sented in a structured manner. No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • There is a structured procedure for inspection of the tools at Supplier’s base – prior to shipment to GSD • The inspection procedure ensures that alle equip-ment is in working condition before the Works are initiated 3. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specif-ic task training including instruction of opera-tors/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted be-fore the operators/crews arrive on site. 4. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors, that ensures that review of local legisla-tion and documentation for installing temporary units on site is conducted. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. An overall evaluation of no. 2-7 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • There is a structured presentation/listing of the tenderers available mixing and storage tanks that are possible for fulfilling the actual Works. 6. • There is a structured presentation/listing of the tenderers proposed well-test-package that is pos-sible for fulfilling the actual Works. 7. • A well-structured and detailed description of each action. The expected timespan for each activity, including all relevant and necessary activities, is realistic. An overall evaluation of no. 2-7 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.
  • The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-3) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-5) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-3) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-5) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evalua-tion of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the ten-derer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.

Beskrivelser af krav til deltagelse

  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities (e.g., an affiliated company or a sub-contractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g., a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfil the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfils it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 75.000 EUR.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to four (4) most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past three (3) years as part of the application. By "undertaken in the past three (3) years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting three (3) years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. LOT 1: The references should describe Intervention Services, and include: • A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including: • A description of the Works carried out for each delivery/job. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables the Contracting Authority to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfil requirements compara-ble to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 and 2A for LOT 1 - ex in volume and scope. • Works performed onshore or offshore including a Technical & Cost proposal demonstrating experience with;  Pulsed neutron logging  Production Logging  Caliper of Tubing conditions • Works demonstrating experience with data interpretation and including combining the results with old data from previous well logs • Works demonstrating experience with gas storage or other wells • Contract value (if possible) • Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery for the specific Works/job – not project (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed four (4) when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: LOT 1: - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works/a job demon-strating experience with Pulsed neutron logging and data interpretation including combining the results with old data from previous well logs. - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works demonstrating experience with Caliper of Tubing Conditions.
  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities (e.g., an affiliated company or a sub-contractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g., a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfil the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfils it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 2: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 60.000 EUR.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to four (4) most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past three (3) years as part of the application. By "undertaken in the past three (3) years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting three (3) years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. LOT 2: The references should describe Intervention Services, and include: • A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including: • A description of the Works carried out for each delivery/job. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables the Contracting Authority to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfil requirements compara-ble to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 and 2A for LOT 2 - ex in volume and scope. • Works performed onshore or offshore including a Technical & Cost proposal demonstrating experience with;  Wireline intervention covering Slick line and E-Line operations as • Caliper of Tubing conditions • Ultrasonic measurement • Tubing Integrity & Leak Rate measurement • Replacement of WL-SSSV • Works demonstrating experience with Caliper of Tubing conditions and data evaluation of work. • Works demonstrating experience with Cutting Tubing and Casing. • Works demonstrating experience with gas storage or other wells • Contract value (if possible) • Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery for the specific Works/job – not project (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed four (4) when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: LOT 2: - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works demonstration experience with replacement of WL-SSSV. - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works demonstrating experience with Tubing Integrity & Leak Rate Measurement in the same delivery/job.
  • The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities (e.g., an affiliated company or a sub-contractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g., a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. In this context it will be sufficient that one of the entities fulfil the standards required in isolation or that the applicant, including the capacity of other entities, or a group of economic operators fulfils it jointly. Minimum requirement: LOT 3: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 120.000 EUR.
  • The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C. The applicant is allowed to submit up to four (4) most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past three (3) years as part of the application. By "undertaken in the past three (3) years” implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting three (3) years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. LOT 3: The references should describe Intervention Services, and include: • A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including: • A description of the Works carried out for each delivery/job. The applicant must strive for a level of detail which enables the Contracting Authority to form an impression of the tenderer’s ability to fulfil requirements compara-ble to the tendered assignment in Appendix 2 and 2A for LOT 3 - ex in volume and scope. • Works performed onshore or offshore including a Technical & Cost proposal demonstrating experience with;  Coil Tubing  Fluid & Nitrogen pumping  Well clean-up • Works demonstrating experience with stand-alone Fluid pumping. • Works demonstrating experience with stand-alone Nitrogen pumping. • Works demonstrating experience with gas storage or other wells • Contract value (if possible) • Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person) • Date of initiation and final delivery for the specific Works/job – not project (day, month, year) Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the selection of applicants. Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators, the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed four (4) when combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities’ capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity. Minimum requirement: LOT 3: - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works demonstrating experience with Nitrogen pumping. - The applicant must state minimum one (1) reference regarding Works demonstrating experience with Fluid pumping.

Udbudsmateriale

Aflevering af tilbud

Åbn originaludbud

Andre bekendtgørelser i samme CPV-kategori

Nyeste bekendtgørelser med samme firecifrede CPV-kategori. Listen kan omfatte både åbne udbud og historik.